A friend posted a Jonjo, a biologically male mannequin, the kind who wear pink and ribbons

I am also posting the following comment (look at the photo) and FB penalizes me for 6!!! days. Until March 13, I can only post on a personal profile and on my page. In groups - no. The whole world is a slop, and people, if they are not directly affected by something, sleep. And no - I will not give up the benefits of this social network, because FB can be very useful. But I will not tolerate such hogwash.

Why am I being punished? Robot machine she caught the wrong word (burying, hanging) and decided that I was agitating for violence and so on or a person, bent on sanctioning any comment against this simplification and mortification of a man and masculinity in general?? Whichever it is, I refuse to accept it and comply.

At the same time, hackers are running rampant around the web, stealing profiles, viral links are spreading in the messenger, and if God forbid you open one, your whole computer can be screwed up. But… this is obviously so important. It is more important to impose restrictions because of one particular word without looking into the meaning, ie. without thinking. This same network is full of violence, aggression, attacks, malice... but as long as the right words are used, the comments and posts remain. Is this the modern yardstick of right and wrong!?!? A bunch of characters that carry a different message depending on what the writer put in. But this presupposes THINKING, which is not characteristic of bot machines lurking for words, and has not been characteristic of many humanoids for a long time.

At least I have the right to express an opinion about this new "culture" that sinfully promotes something unnatural and against nature. A new trend that confuses the masculine and the feminine to the point of obscenity, and people begin to get confused as to where the right actually is and where the impurity begins. And don't get me wrong. I'm not a racist, nor a xenophobe. I deeply respect the free will of a person, their race, creed, religion, gender, culture - as long as they carry a good message... and as long as they are not foisted on me to replace mine.

Homosexuality is part of nature. It always has been and always will be. it exists even in animals. This suggests that having an attraction to one's own biological sex is not a sin and a shame. But it is not the norm, but the exception. Because the main role of the human being is to reproduce, and this happens with TWO different sexes - MALE and FEMALE. Therefore, homo people or hetero people, who do not wish to create offspring, should be perceived quite normally, without unnecessary emotions, BUT remain in the sphere of exception.

At the same time, the world is sharply divided on the subject. Why? Because someone begins to distort the natural exception and impose it as a mass norm. The holy words "mom" and "dad" have already been replaced somewhere with the impersonal "parent 1". Biological men become energetic women with a phallus between their legs, and women slowly and slowly lose their natural femininity and step out of their main role, which, by the way, for centuries has been tossed between the two extremes - either a slave without rights or a super-woman who with its self-sufficiency depersonalizes and renders man meaningless as an existence.

I can't accept this, it doesn't come naturally to me. And at least I have the right to express an opinion, to discuss the issue with other people, publicly... because it is in the public discussion of something that the truth is born. But discussion cultured, with arguments, without unnecessary emotions and certainly without malice. But someone has decided to slowly but surely take that right off the table. This is how…

And critical thinking in general is very unacceptable to modern Western civilization. We got there to be direct participants in the tale "The King's New Clothes", where no one dares to say out loud that the king is naked !! At first we say it in our mind, then we start to believe that it really is in new, shiny clothes. Because a lie repeated a hundred times becomes the truth. And I wonder - why do people do it!? Why are they silent? Then I look around and the answer comes by itself. Because either they are in the zone of the critical minimum and they, clinging to their one remaining gem in the form of some kind of freedom, hold it tight and keep silent in order not to lose it too (because a person who has nothing to lose will much more easily jump)... or they are satisfied with their satiety, they stay in the golden cage, not realizing how dependent they really are.

I don't know if people realize what social networks really are. Let's start from the fact that man is by his nature a social being, he was created to live in a society, in a society and to communicate with others of his kind. And expressing a public opinion to this society is the most natural and normal thing. Most of us remember the time before the Internet. How limited we were from accessing information. And today... you can share everything with the whole world with one click. This thought is truly intoxicating. To be able to communicate anywhere, anytime, with everyone. No matter which network you use. It's so addicting. Like a drug. You get used to it quickly... and this is where the limitations begin. Sometimes imperative, in most cases insane and thoughtless.

And you, man, are starting to come to terms. With everything. Even with the wrong one. You know it's wrong, but you become obedient, because otherwise they will take away this privilege of communication...to which you are already deeply addicted. If you still decide to kick against the grain, THEY restrict your access for a little while... until you fall into withdrawal and don't dare a second time. And light, you slowly get used to it. In the end, you don't even notice. You get used to limiting yourself, not thinking, not expressing a position, but saying only what is convenient for those in power. So that they don't take your energy drug.